Saturday, February 10, 2007

Is the American education system taking creativity away?

I posted a brief comment regarding NCLB and creativity at Helium. The link below will take you to that post. Thanks for taking a look at this short piece.



Is the American education system taking creativity away? - Helium



Technorati Tags: , ,

Friday, February 09, 2007

No Child Left Behind

You might want to check out the following post at Helium.com:



Understanding the "No child left behind" law - Helium



powered by performancing firefox

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

A school finds a singular road to academic success - Los Angeles Times

A school finds a singular road to academic success - Los Angeles Times

This is the most hopeful I have been in a long time. It is not about raising standards, placing more of a burden on schools to prepare students for tests, or doing the same old thing that has been done before. To change schools one must change expectations. That means that teacher expectations must change; expectations of students and of the quality of their work. Student expectations must also change but in order to create a context in which student attitudes can change, teachers must take the first step. What a concept. I am sharing this article with all three of my teacher preparation classes this semester.

Education Week: Standards Get Boost on the Hill

Education Week: Standards Get Boost on the Hill

Oh my, what's next. States are not meeting current standards set by the Republican Congress through the No Child Left Behind Act so the solution must be to create even tougher standards to make sure that we are completely fair in our attempt to reduce everyone to the same, to engage in totalization of the self in the name of rigor. I simply don't get it. NCLB is broke and needs fixing, that is for sure. But the answer is not to get even tougher. Perhaps, and this might just be a radical thought, we ought to think more in terms of what the real objective might be. If the objective is to separate and categorize members of our democratic republic, then by all means continue along the lines we have laid out--indeed get tougher for that will separate and categorize far faster than anything else we could do. But if the objective is to help school children become active, critical participants in our democracy, then we must begin to think boldly--GOOD TEACHING INDEED TAKES CARE OF BAD TESTING. What about concentrating our efforts into inviting students into the classroom as active, engaged participants in areas of study. Let children practice history, become scientists, find real and practical uses for mathematics, and read as adults read, for the sake of reading alone. Then, and only then, can we learn to celebrate the diversity of our classrooms, hope to improve schools and find that our students are far smarter than NCLB gives them credit for. Until then, just shout LEARN and don't spare the rod either.